This summer I spent two weeks working with the staff of MLC in Sydney, Australia. MLC invited three teachers from High Tech High (where I teach) to facilitate collegial dialogues and consult on projects at their school. The experience was rewarding both professionally and personally. The following is a journal of my time at the school.
| Feeling right at home with MLC's junior school staff |
- Thematic units supported by work, related to those themes, in each subject
- Integrated projects with a single product supported by learning in each class
For the most part, I played the role of facilitator. My goal
was to guide conversations between teachers in order to find authentic and purposeful
ways of integrating their classes for the purpose of unifying projects. I used
project tuning protocols and created hybrid protocols (based on ideas from High
Tech High) to provide structure for our conversations – always being mindful of
these norms:
- Be hard on content, soft on people
- Share the air
- Be kind, specific and helpful
- Equity – We’re striving for equity in our conversation in terms of sharing ideas and sharing our airtime. Is there an opportunity for everyone to shine?
- Consensus
– Ultimately, everyone needs to be on board with the group’s idea.
- Compromise – However, we know that some level of compromise will be necessary to attain this. We’ll need to make some compromises with our ideas.
I enjoyed my time with the Junior School teachers and heads.
The opportunity to sit down and engage in collegial discussion with teachers is
unparalleled to any experience in my 7 years of teaching. Two weeks of critical
and academic meetings not only honed my skills as a facilitator, but exposed me
to a multitude of refreshing ideas and approaches to teaching. The Reggio
Emilia Approach can be seen in almost everything the teachers do at the junior
school. This approach, drawn from the work of Loris Malaguzzi, an Italian educator, is based on four powerful principles (which
connect strongly with High Tech High’s design principles). Teachers at the
junior school strive for children to have the following (and I saw evidence of
this when I observed classes):
- Some control over the direction of their learning
- The opportunity to learn through experiences of touching, moving, listening, seeing, and hearing
- A relationship with other children and material items in the world which can be explored
- Endless avenues and opportunities to express themselves
My time at MLC gave me a first hand glimpse into the education
system of Australia and I received a real introduction to all things Aussie.
Yes, our conversations naturally veered from collegial to congenial! And so I
learned “heaps” about the Aussie style of English. You can abbreviate and add a
“y” or “ies” to just about anything: brekky, kindy, sunnies, bikies. Everyday I
came into contact with unknown idiomatic expressions that I quickly tried to
implement into my own vernacular. How ya going? Great! It’s cold in the Blue
Mountains, you better rug up! O.k. Bigger than Ben Hur. Throw a spanner in the
works. It's all hairy fairy. My journal is packed with great expressions like this. I
also learned a great deal about the history of Oz – especially its gold mining
chapter (thanks to the junior school’s resident historian, Doug Finlay). And
let’s not forget tea time. I learned that Milo is enjoyed most when partially
stirred into chilled milk and pumpkin soup is best with a dab of pesto (Thanks to
Nicole Ginnane and Jane Lancaster).
Overall, the staff of the Junior School was accepting of my role
as an outside facilitator. Throughout each step of the process I was treated
with respect – yet always honestly and critically. I was invited into the
conversation like a true member of the staff. The Pre-K through Year 5 teachers
are a passionate, creative crew who relished the opportunity to reflect on
their approach to projects and take next steps towards deeper collaboration.
Here is a summary of my experiences and the project ideas
that were brainstormed, tuned and planned throughout my time at the Junior
School:
Pre-K – Imagination
The Pre-K teachers, Terri-Anne and Rachel, blew everyone
away at a project tuning attended by junior and senior school staff. Their
project about imagination pushed the limits of most teachers’ conceptions of
what can be accomplished with such young learners. In this class, students
brainstormed ideas for fantasy worlds they could create in their classroom and
fantasy characters. The end product will be a comic book in which their fantasy
characters will enter these worlds. When I observed this classroom I saw
boundless creativity and energy shared by the students and teachers alike. It
was inspiring to see how both teachers channeled their students’ ideas into the
work they were producing. The classroom was alive with inquiry and creativity!
The big idea in this CLP is for students to design the Pre-K/Kindy
outdoor play space. Susan, Sophie, Sheli and Jane began with an immersion
experience that gave their students the opportunity to explore the outdoor
space. Students rotated through four stations based on their ideas and
interests. Each station gave the students a different experience meant to
further their thinking:
·
Drama/dance
·
Physical activity/sports
·
Quiet activities (puzzles and books)
·
Art
The teachers followed up the experience with small group
conversations. These debriefs helped the teachers further develop options for
designing the outdoor space. I was struck by how the teachers always considered
the voices of the kids in their next steps. Everything was built upon their
interests and questions. I love the democratic approach that teachers took with
students as young as kindergartners. Their consideration for the developing
decision-making and critical thinking skills of these young girls is admirable.
Year
1 had an interesting concept for a project. Students explored the idea
of play and why it's important for human development. When I observed
the class, students were engaged in learning stations where they
constructed various toys from an assortment of materials. After
constructing and playing with the toys, teachers asked them to define
what made the toy engaging or fun. The idea was for them to construct
knowledge about play. The essential question of this CLP was "Do we need
to play? How? Why?" I had a lot of fun discussing this project's design
with the Year 1 teachers. After a project-tuning and planning session,
it was decided that the students would design a toy for a younger
student using recycled materials gathered at a local organization,
Reverse Garbage. Students would explore the history of toys, interview
other students, write an accompanying story for the toy and explore
accompanying literature like The Nutcracker and Heart of the Tiger.
Ultimately, students will discover the varying purposes of toys and the
value of recycled materials. I was struck by the teachers' commitment to
letting the students experiment and make their own discoveries
throughout the project. Very student-centered! I have a feeling that
this is going to be a really fun project with great products to share
with an audience.
During my time in the Year 2 class, teachers and students
were immersed in a brainstorming activity around two concepts: robotics and
transport. Teachers wanted to see if the girls could find a natural connection
between the two topics and encouraged them to write down their questions. After
rotating through different stations (where students generated posters
representing their ideas and questions),
the girls shared out the ideas that struck them in a circular
discussion, facilitated by Mrs. Zanapalis & classmates who wrote the ideas
on the front board. In the end, teachers discovered that students had many more
authentic questions about robots/robotics than transport (which was the
original topic of the CLP). Using this information, the Year 2 teachers decided
to design a project that concentrated on robots/robotics, but addressed
transport. The project will focus on kinetic energy, push and pull, gravity and
fiction through the use of Lego Mindstorms (buildable and programmable robots).
Additionally, students will explore the history of transport in order to solve
a problem with their own design for a robot. The results should be very
exciting!
I spent a great deal of time getting to know the Year 3
teachers and helped guide their planning for the Faith & Soul project
(whose name had not been decided during my visit). Their project explored the
questions: What is faith? What is a soul? I attended their immersion day event
which really set a reflective and spiritual tone for the project. Mrs. Falls,
Mrs. Roden, Mrs. Gold and Mrs. Lancaster prepared an experience in which
students entered a candle-lit room with incense and meditative music. Once
seated, students were led through yoga breathing and stretching exercises by
Mrs. Gold. The teachers then read a book called “The Soul Bird,” a poetic story
full of metaphor and spiritual musings. Students were then asked to draw a
picture of their soul bird (a creature that lives within them that has
thoughts, feelings, and dreams). The drawings produced by students were
creative, original and powerful. Unfortunately, I didn’t snap any shots of
them. The immersion experience was designed to get students authentically
wondering about their soul and the concept of faith.
After many rounds of tuning and planning, the Year 5
teachers developed a plan for a final, cohesive project that would encompass
the learning throughout HSIE, drama and art. The final idea that emerged was a
soul box, designed by the students and containing artifacts of their learning
about different faiths and exploration of the soul concept. Throughout my time
with the Year 3 teachers I was impressed by their respect for the students’
varying perspectives and faiths. Additionally, they strove to design a project
that catered to the authentic interests and inquiries of their students. Their
final celebration of learning (exhibition of student work) should be
fascinating!
During my time with Year 4 I learned a great deal about the
colonization of Australia. It was so interesting to find parallels with that of
the United States. As a teacher, I love it when I have a genuine interest in a
topic and can seek the tutelage of students who are learning about it. I spent
an hour in Mrs. Carr, Mrs. Goodwill and Mrs. Campbell’s classroom learning
about the early European exploration of Australia through conversations with
their students. The experience was enlightening! I had no idea that the
Portuguese were involved long before the English. The Year 4 project focused on
colonization as seen through the eyes of aborigines, convicts, decision-makers
in England and the Year 4 students.
This group of teachers gave great consideration to the idea
of honoring multiple perspectives and has gone to great strides to provide
abundant resources to their girls. Mrs. Campbell worked hard to integrate
technology and rich media opportunities into the project. During my classroom
observation, the three teachers integrated their classes seamlessly and worked
collaboratively to guide the students on a webquest for information about early
colonization. They used various web tools to engage students (Schoology &
Museum Box – both worth Googling). Through project tunings and planning
sessions, the Year 4 teachers agreed that their project would culminate with
one product – a
museum box (a artifact containing 6-sided cubes wrapped in
images, text and video). Students will choose a perspective (aborigine, convict
or decision-maker) and team up
with students exploring different perspectives. Together they will design a
museum box containing cubes of varying perspectives, including their own. It’s
hard to explain without looking at the software (I encourage you to have a
look: http://museumbox.e2bn.org/).
However, I can imagine that the exhibition of this work will be highly
engaging. The teachers are planning on creating a scavenger hunt in which
visitors/parents will seek information/knowledge as they visit each group and
their museum box. I look forward to seeing the students work and learning more
about this pivotal time in Australian history.
Year 5 – Gold
Again, it was so interesting to learn about Australia’s own
gold rush which was connected to the gold rush of my home state, California, in
the U.S.A. I enjoyed conversing
with the Year 5 teachers and brainstorming ideas for a collaborative project
about gold. Throughout project tuning and planning sessions, various ideas were
developed and honed. One idea that really struck me was a movie project – The
Life of A Gold Nugget. This idea integrated HSIE, science, math, drama,
technology and art. Teachers would break students into groups of interest:
·
Science
·
Ancient civilizations
·
Australian gold rush
·
Impacts and modern influences of gold
Each group would learn about their area and develop a
chapter in the
movie – revolving around an animated gold nugget that would be
the audience’s guide.
Ultimately, the team decided to break into smaller
collaborative pairs (rather than a group of 4 teachers) and produce two
projects. These conversations took place after my departure and I don’t know
the exact details of their plans. I look forward to seeing these projects
evolve. The Year 5 teachers were full of really innovative ideas and will
undoubtedly produce something engaging and unique work with their students.
Teacher Take Aways
Collaboration and designing projects is tough work, but it’s
totally worth it. Throughout my time at MLC’s junior school I saw the power of
protocols and the strength of incorporating multiple perspectives in dialogues
around project design. The project-tuning protocol proved invaluable in
allowing teachers to safely present ideas to their colleagues and receive
constructive, yet critical, feedback and validation of their work. In the
beginning, integrating ideas in the CLPs and strengthening collaboration sometimes seemed
challenging. However, over those two weeks, the meetings helped teachers see
the strength that lies in pooling resources and seeking the expertise of
colleagues through a structured, solution-oriented process. The junior school
teachers attested to this multiple times during my visit.
Throughout my time using project-tuning and planning
protocols with MLC teachers, I gained a deeper respect for the norms and
structure of protocol. I look forward to bringing this newfound understanding
back to my own staff at High Tech Middle in order to fine tune our process.
I also look forward to bringing the idea of an immersion
experience back to my school. The idea of immersing the students in an
experience to stimulate questions and thoughts, plus activate prior knowledge,
is powerful. I really saw it working at the junior school. I think this
approach could really enhance some of the projects we do at High Tech.

Hi Bobby,
ReplyDeleteIt has been great revisiting your time with us in our class studio's through your blog and the wonderful photos you took while at MLC. I am happy to report that year 2 students have been busy building their robots and posing many more questions to my delight.
Thanks again
Claudia,
DeleteI'm so excited to see what the students come up with for their designs and what avenues of exploration their questions lead them down! Please keep me posted.